October 12, 2017

Why worry about my presentations when I write well enough to get articles published?

A guest post by Ellen Finkelstein, a Presenting, Powerpoint and Speaking Expert

See below for invitation to her free webinar!

You publish your work in order to inform the academic community about your research or field of study.  It matters that your audience understand what you write, or you won’t achieve your goal.  The process of submitting to an edited journal may help your writing become clearer, but what process do you use to spiff up your speaking?

Speaking is different from writing:

  • You write alone but speak to a group.
  • You can edit your writing before you submit it, but can’t take back what you say.
  • Your writing audience can stop reading when they get bored, but your live audience pretty much has to sit there, even if you bore them to tears.
  • When you get a reader’s inquiry about your writing, you can think about how to respond; when an audience member asks you a question, you need a quick response
  • Your audience members look at your writing up close but usually have to see your slides from wherever they are in the room.
  • Your audience can reread difficult or interesting sections of your writing, but your presentation needs to be structured in a way that helps your audience understand and remember what you say immediately.
You’ve probably heard of the term "Death by PowerPoint." A quick definition would be showing slides with all of your talk typed on them, and you reading them. It might include graphs and other evidence shown in a way that’s unreadable to anyone not in the first two rows. Death by PowerPoint is unfortunately common in academia, and will lead to your losing the opportunity to interest people in your work.

You must show and tell

Because speaking is a medium that passes quickly, you need to use the knowledge of brain science to help your audience fully understand, engage with you and remember what you say. If you don’t, not only will your audience be bored, but your goal of reaching your audience will not be fulfilled.

child reading picture book
One way to get your audience focused and engaged is to tell your point and then show it with a graph, image, or other graphic. This technique is based on research by Michael Alley, a professor of engineering at Penn State’s School of Engineering. He calls his system “assertion-evidence.” Although he worked with scientific presentations, the principles apply to any presentation.

I call it Tell ‘n’ Show. Almost every slide should combine a title that tells your point with a graphic that shows it. Learning how to create slides like that will transform your experience as a presenter and your audience’s experience as receiver of your content. It’s just like this boy’s book – one side tells the story and the other side shows it, with a BIG picture.

*********************************************************************************

If you’d like to learn more about academic presenting, both for your academic colleagues and for students, Ellen has agreed to present her free webinar:
on Monday, October 16, 2017 at 2:00 pm Eastern, 1:00 Central, Noon Mountain, 11:00 Pacific, 7:00 London, 8:00 Paris.  Try to get there a few minutes early to ensure a place.

We look forward to you joining us and to Ellen helping you create better, more engaging presentations!

August 12, 2017

Common sense, but unusual, tips for better writing

5 ways for PR pros to sharpen their writing by Megan Krause

I LOVE this article from PR Daily (click on title to read).  The advice is spot on, and it goes beyond the typical advice, such as "use the active voice."

My favorite tip is:  Stop Being Wishy-Washy.  As the author states:
When you're done writing, go back through your copy eyeing timid words and phrases. Strike out any instance of "just"—as in, "I'm just writing to say" or "I just want you to know"—you don't need to qualify what you're saying. It's OK to have an opinion.
I've given the same advice to my academic coaching clients.  And I agree that you should edit later to find the wishy-washy phrases, as opposed to trying to write that way in your first drafts.  See the article for the list of words to look out for.

The wishy-washiness goes beyond words that weaken the sentence.  Writers can be wishy-washy about getting to the point, even hiding their main argument in a pile of words.  I tell my clients:

Come right out and say it!

Don't make the reader search for your main point!   You don't want your reader to be annoyed with you before you even get to the point.  Own it, state it proudly, then explain. 

I've done exactly this myself, when I write newsletter articles and blog post.  Often I've found that the second or third paragraph can become the first, and it then looks perfectly clear.  So play around with the order of your paragraphs, once you've written a few drafts.  You may be surprised at how much better it reads.

November 25, 2016

The Second Holiday Writing Challenge for Academics

academics ready to writeHere's a little boost for those who need a little kickstart to write over the holidays.  I first offered a Holiday Writing Challenge back in 2005, so I'd say it's about time to do it again.

Here's what you do: Post in the comment section:
  • what you'd like to work on (if anything) over the holidays, and
  • the maximum amount of time you'd like to spend on it daily.
Please keep this time limit reasonable and low unless you're under huge deadline pressure -- in which case you don't need this challenge in order to get something done!

Whether you're a professor or a grad student, make sure you get a copy of the Dissertation Toolkit.  These tools will give you more information and tips for productive and creative writing.

 For those of you who have had trouble making yourself write, you may want to start with VERY short writing goals. Even 5 or 10 minutes will be enough to get you jumpstarted.  Don't go more than 25 or 30 minutes without a break.

Using a timer helps. Many subscribe to the Pomodoro technique of scheduling writing sessions.

This article will help you if you tend to aim for too much time and then beat yourself up because you couldn't do it.

After you post what you'd like to work on and your maximum time per day, what's next?  Go back to this post daily, weekly or just at the end of the challenge (shall we say January 15?) to say how you did, to tell us about your problems or to encourage and commiserate with others.

This experience will give you a teeny tiny feel of the Academic Writing Club.

So, to summarize:
  • Post what you're working on
  • Post your daily time commitment
  • Post again periodically to tell us how you're doing -- I'll receive all posts as emails and will comment and encourage you!
If you think you'll need more than a little boost to get you going and/or keep you going, please join the Academic Writing Club. Thousands of academics like you have used the AWC to boost their writing productivity.

If you're already a member, get a friend to join: then you can both use the coupon code REFERME to get $10 off!

Good luck and happy holidays!

October 31, 2015

Effective, Efficient, Effectual, and Efficacious: Attempts to Define

Are there some words that drive you crazy because you're not sure which of many apparent synonyms to choose?

Maeve Maddox, who writes the Daily Writing Tips blog, discusses the various ways that the words "effective," "efficient," "effectual" and efficacious can be used. 

I thought that these words may play a part in your scholarly writing; or maybe, like me, you just enjoy thinking about words and language.

effective stampIf so, then check out her blog.  It will be an efficient use of your time, and may be an effective way to improve your writing.



Labels: , ,

January 8, 2015

Poms revisited

Poms, Pomodoros, Tomayto, Tomahto...


I received a reminder today from Ellis Wakefield that this blog hasn't featured Poms for a while.  He wrote me to let me know that he had recently published a short article called "The Pomodoro Technique – The Ultimate Task Ender" in Red Shed, about the use of Poms, or Pomodoros, in getting tasks done.  I thought it was a nice, clear, simple explanation and I refer you there.

We've blogged about Poms before -- see "What on Earth Are Poms?" by Susanne Morgan.

Here is the official Pomodoro Website and the book created by Francesco Cirillo, the originator of the Pomodoro Technique.

Want Your Own Tomato?

Want your own Pomodoro Timer?
Click the tomato -- it's only US $.49
In case you get inspired to have your own actual tomato timer ("pomodoro" is Italian for tomato) ticking away while you write, click on the tomato timer on the right to access one for $.49.  Many Pomodoro technique fanatics feel the ticking is soothing but also reminds you to stay on task.

The Pomodoro Technique has become incredibly popular in the chat rooms in our Academic Writing Club (AWC), our structured, online, accountability-based coaching system that has helped thousands and thousands of academics write more productively and improve their careers.


As a matter of fact, below is a screenshot of a recent Challenge Chat, which is inexplicably beige -- I haven't figured out how to turn it back to a white background!

As you can see, this Challenge Chat is hosted by Coach Debra.

Debra hosts these Challenge Chat at regularly scheduled times, and Academic Writing Club members join her for that extra motivation to write.  It's like meeting a friend in the coffee shop to do some work.  In fact, we call our main chat the Club Café.  There's nothing like companionship when you work.

Debra asks people to say what they're going to work on, and then they switch to Pom language.  I'd like to call it Pomeranian, but some dogs took that name.  After 25 minutes (the first Pom), they reconvene and say how their writing has gone during that Pom.

Then some decide to keep the Poms going, with breaks according to the Pom rules.

A Challenge Chat, which in reality has a WHITE BACKGROUND AND NOT BEIGE.  Sorry to rant.

Consider joining us in the Academic Writing Club!  As you can see people have lots of fun and lots of Poms and support each other, and they get fantastic results.  Can you afford not to write?  

What do you think of this Pomodoro Technique?

September 25, 2014

Are you an editorial hypocrite?


Why do some academics still sniff at the idea of using a professional editor?

Some in academia believe that without rigorous standards the integrity of their rarified product is at risk.  I argue that this is not only untrue, but harmful to the productivity of many academic writers. I’m not the first one to raise these questions, but I have a few pretty good arguments that I hope will convince you to use a professional editor if you feel the need.  Let’s look at the myths that keep academics from using an editor
  • The editor might give you an idea, so it’s not original. I’m tackling the big one first.  Try this on for size:  it’s not where an idea comes from that matters. After all, you get ideas from all kinds of places – colleagues at conferences, from your friends, peers, the guy next door, your professors, in classes. People are noting ideas from each other all the time.  No idea belongs entirely to anyone.

    What matters is the originality of an argument and its precise expression, the persuasiveness of a thesis based on the evidence presented.

  • The best work gets done by one isolated individual. Creative writers in MFA programs expose their work to relentless workshopping, and yet no one questions whether the final draft of a story, poem or novel belongs to that writer alone. In many disciplines, particularly in certain areas of the humanities, personal creativity and originality are at stake, and yet collaboration (which is not what editors do) is understood to be part of the process.

    How is the issue different for a writer because he or she is an academic? If one’s position is that editing is synonymous with collaboration, then why is that argument not universally extended to any kind of writing?

  • We’re so smart that we can do our own editing.  Intelligence and writing ability are not necessarily correlated.  Also, in some circumstances, employing an editor is a necessity: In multi-author works, for example, a disinterested party is essential to smooth out transitions and create a consistent tone. Without that, the paper will feel like a series of chapters by different authors instead of the joint project it was intended to be.

  • I don’t care if English isn’t your first language; that’s no excuse to hire an editor.  So many brilliant and creative academics come to English-speaking countries to enjoy our excellent educational system.  Most English-speaking people are not even fluent in one other language, particularly when it comes to language. After all, people who came to their new country 40 years ago can make small language mistakes.  (I should know; I’m engaged to one!)  

    Even native English speakers get confused about their own language.  For example, prepositions.  People are now starting to say, “I’m excited for…” instead of “I’m excited about.”  In many cases, when English is an academic’s second language, not employing an editor would be a tragic mistake.  

  • Because some people use writing help unethically, we should ban any kind of help with writing.  Of course, there are right ways and wrong ways of using editorial help. It’s never acceptable to hire someone to do the writing for you, or to plagiarize published sources.  But let’s not get carried away because some people do the wrong thing.  Let’s bring an informed understanding of what legitimate editors and writing coaches actually do. 

  • Dissertation advisors or faculty mentors provide enough help, so academics don’t need editors.  No comment needed.
It’s unrealistic to expect academics to be experts at everything, if you value academic excellence, then it’s hypocritical to discourage the use of professional editors.

Is it OK to use a professional editor?  Where do you stand on this?

August 21, 2014

If procrastination is "a common pulse of humanity," then what can we do to stop it?

In "Getting over Procrastination," NY Times writer Maria Konnikova discusses Piers Steel's research The Procrastination Equation, Steel explains that "procrastination leads to lower over-all well-being, worse health, and lower salaries."
on procrastination, reporting Steel's finding that procrastination is "a common pulse of humanity," and that it affects 99% of college students in one way or another and translates to significant monetary losses in the work world.  In his book,

So if procrastination is so bad for us, why do we do it?  According to Konnikova, Steel's research indicates the answer lies on "the flip side of impulsivity."  Those of us who are not good at self-regulating or delaying rewards until after we have engaged in unpleasant tasks will often be the same people who struggle the most with procrastination.

But I wonder -- most academics have been able to delay rewards while they suffered and struggled to achieve their goals.  Most of you were not the kind of child who never did your homework, for example.

Yet academics struggle with procrastination, especially on projects that have no external deadlines.  So, for example, a faculty member may write a report for the dean, but neglect her own manuscript.  After all, that can wait until tomorrow and the dean can't.

In a way, academics have learned to put their needs last.  And writing up your own research is much more unpleasant than whipping up a report.  Besides, you have no choice with the report.

Procrastination is a more insidious problem for those who have seemingly endless time to complete their project.  Unfortunately, however, the time until completion is not endless.  You either finish your dissertation or leave, at some point. You either publish enough (and fulfill other requirements) to get tenure, or you're out.  And there is a specific date for that.  Seemingly very far in the future.  Not.

If you are a chronic procrastinator, Konnikova's entire article is well worth a look, as is Steel's book. The article also includes a link to an online procrastination test and several other tools that may help you assess your tendencies to put off that which is the most important, or, in Stephen Covey terms, those tasks that are "important but not urgent."

Be sure to watch this blog for a follow-up article, where I'll offer some practical suggestions on how you can tame the procrastination beast.

Do you procrastinate, especially on your own important writing that has no specific deadline?  If so, what strategies have worked for you at interrupting procrastination's common but destructive pulse? Is the supposedly non-existent deadline actually creeping up on you?